New Step by Step Map For speaker production order jurisdiction case law in india
New Step by Step Map For speaker production order jurisdiction case law in india
Blog Article
“There is no ocular evidence to show that Muhammad Abbas was murdered by any of your present petitioners. Mere fact that Noor Muhammad and Muhammad Din observed firstly the deceased and after a ways they noticed the petitioners going towards the same direction, didn't mean that the petitioners were chasing the deceased or were accompanying him. This sort of evidence cannot be treated as evidence of very last observed.
کیا ایف آئی آر درخواست گزار کی رپورٹ پر درج کی گئی تھی اور اگر ہاں تو کیا اسے اس کے خلاف ثبوت کے طور پر استعمال کیا جا سکتا ہے؟
This Court may perhaps interfere where the authority held the proceedings against the delinquent officer inside a fashion inconsistent with the rules of natural justice or in violation of statutory rules prescribing the mode of inquiry or where the conclusion or finding achieved by the disciplinary authority is based on no evidence. In the event the summary or finding is like no reasonable person would have ever achieved, the Court might interfere with the summary or maybe the finding and mold the relief to make it ideal to the facts of each and every case. In service jurisprudence, the disciplinary authority is definitely the sole judge of facts. Where the appeal is presented, the appellate authority has coextensive power to re-recognize the evidence or maybe the nature of punishment. About the aforesaid proposition, we are fortified through the decision from the Supreme Court while in the case of Ghulam Murtaza Shaikh v. Chief Minister Sindh (2024 SCMR 1757). Bench: Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Karim Khan Agha, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Creator) Source: Order: Downloads 252 Order Date: 24-JAN-25 Approved for Reporting WhatsApp
The convictions and sentences Upheld, as misappropriation was committed within the bank and since only the appellants were posted within the relevant time .(Criminal Appeal )
prolonged period petitioner was not deemed for promotion, meeting of the departmental promotion committee and take into account the petitioner (Promotion)
The case addresses An array of issues like, environmental protection, and an expansive interpretation with the right to life.
Petitioner acquiring been declared an absconder in this case for over a single plus a 50 % year generates the apprehension that the petitioner might avoid standing trial and that's why delay the prosecution of your case. The material on record makes the case of your petitioner falls under two exceptions to the rule of grant of bail as mentioned over.
Electronic and paper court records retained on the court site can be viewed for the courthouse for free, however there can be a fee of ten cents per page to print from a public access terminal.
Section 302 of the PPC outlines the punishment for “Qatl-i-Amd” (intentional murder) in Pakistan. According to this provision, get more info if a person intentionally causes the death of another individual, they shall be subject matter to your most severe form of punishment permissible under Pakistani legislation.
If granted absolute immunity, the parties would not only be protected from liability during the matter, but could not be answerable in any way for their actions. When the court delayed making this kind of ruling, the defendants took their request to the appellate court.
In some jurisdictions, case regulation might be applied to ongoing adjudication; for example, criminal proceedings or family legislation.
ten. Without touching the merits with the case from the issue of annual increases from the pensionary emoluments of your petitioner, in terms of policy decision of your provincial government, these types of annual increase, if permissible from the case of employees of KMC, calls for further assessment for being made through the court of plenary jurisdiction. KMC's reluctance as a consequence of funding issues and insufficient adoption of provincial increases, creates a factual dispute that cannot be resolved in writ jurisdiction, necessitating the petitioner to pursue other legal avenues. Read more
13309-B of 2010 being weak types of evidence plus the evidentiary value whereof would be observed in the time in the trial. The investigation of this case has already been finalized and, As a result, confirmed custody of your petitioner in jail is unlikely to serve any advantageous purpose at this stage.”
To acquire notification from the Supreme Court of Virginia as well as the Court of Appeals of Virginia when opinions, orders, rule changes, dockets and other information has become out there, please enter your contact information beneath.